Banxico decoupled from the Fed, and the Mexican peso had its worst losing streak since 2019
On September 24, a week after the Fed raised rates, the Bank of Mexico held its rate at 6.5% and said it would not react mechanically to Washington. The minutes later showed three of the five board members open to cutting. The peso has lost 9.5% since the start of September, and the bank now depends on the depreciation not reaching prices.
Occurred September 24, 2026
Thesis
Banxico chose to let the exchange rate absorb the U.S. rate hike instead of following it. As long as goods inflation recedes and the economy has slack, the choice holds. But the signal of cuts that appeared in the minutes removed from the peso part of the support that remained in the interest-rate differential, and the cost showed up in the exchange rate before showing up in prices — which is precisely what the bank says it is watching.
What is at stake
For years, the Mexican peso rested on a wide gap between Mexican and U.S. interest rates: it paid to borrow cheap dollars and invest in pesos. In September, the Fed raised U.S. rates, Banxico did not follow, and the minutes of the meeting later showed that the majority of the board is thinking of cutting, not of raising. The gap narrowed to its lowest level in almost two decades, and the peso had its worst losing streak since 2019. For those who import inputs or pay debt in dollars, the bill went up; for exporters and households that receive remittances, each dollar became worth more pesos. The bank is betting that the depreciation will not reach prices strongly because the economy is growing little. If it does, it will have to choose between keeping what it said and defending the currency.
Who is affected
Companies that import inputs and machinery
under pressure · immediate
Inputs priced in dollars become more expensive in pesos, and the volatility forces them to review purchases and prices over shorter horizons.
Peso 8.7% weaker between August 31 and October 16, in our daily series. Producer prices rising 4.05% a year in September.
Exporters to the United States
opportunity · quarters
Dollar revenue is worth more in pesos; the advantage shrinks for those who import components, as much of manufacturing does.
The United States accounted for 69.6% of Mexican trade in 2024, about US$766 billion.
Households that receive remittances
opportunity · immediate
Each dollar sent from abroad now buys more in pesos.
Remittances had fallen 3.6% in dollars in August, before the depreciation, according to the central bank.
Consumers
under pressure · quarters
Pass-through of the exchange rate to the prices of imported goods and of products made with imported inputs.
Market estimate of up to 0.46 percentage point more inflation over twelve months. Annual inflation of 3.45% in September.
Federal public finances
under pressure · quarters
Foreign-currency debt becomes more expensive in pesos, and long-term bond yields rise.
HR Ratings estimates that the depreciation raises public debt from 54% to 55% of GDP.
Possible impacts on people
- Exchange rate
- The smaller interest-rate differential reduced the appeal of holding peso investments just as global volatility rose, and the signal of cuts reinforced the move.Differential of 2.5 percentage points between benchmark rates, the narrowest on a sustained basis since 2008, according to the Institute of International Finance.
- Prices
- Imported goods and dollar-priced inputs reach consumer prices with a lag of months.Goods inflation, the most sensitive to the exchange rate: 3.21% a year in September.
- Credit
- Yields on longer-term government bonds rose, which makes long-term credit more expensive even without a change in the benchmark rate.Gap of 1.43 percentage points between the 28-day and 349-day bonds at the September 29 auction.
Repercussions across the region
Chile
The Chilean peso also lost value over the period, under the same strengthening of the dollar and the same rise in U.S. rates. Chile has held its benchmark rate at 4.5% since December 2025.
Depreciation of 5.4% between August 31 and October 16, against 8.7% for the Mexican peso, in our daily series. We did not measure a direct link between the two currencies.
Peru
The Peruvian sol moved in the same direction, with less intensity. Peru has held its benchmark rate at 4.25% for more than a year.
Depreciation of 4.2% between August 31 and October 16, in our daily series.
What to watch
- The Fed decision of October 27 and 28 and the projections for December.
- The Banxico decision of November 5, and whether the statement keeps the openness to cuts.
- Inflation for the first half of October, especially goods inflation.
- The review of the trade agreement with the United States and Canada, which analysts point to as the kind of Mexico-specific shock that could make the fall disorderly.
- The U.S. ten-year Treasury yield, which exceeded 5.3% in early October.
Pesos per dollar, daily close from our market series. The official Banxico rate differs by hundredths.
What Banxico decided
On September 24, the Governing Board of the Bank of Mexico unanimously held the benchmark rate at 6.5%, the level at which it has stood since May. It was the third consecutive decision without a change.
What drew attention was the statement. The bank removed the phrase indicating that it would keep the rate at the current level and added another: because conditions in Mexico differ from those in the United States, monetary policy would not have to react mechanically to the adjustments expected in the U.S. rate. From then on, it said, it will decide by looking at inflation, slack in the economy, expectations and the pass-through of the exchange rate to prices.
The minutes of the meeting, published on October 8, went further. Three of the five board members said they were willing to evaluate another cut if inflation keeps receding; one of them spoke of a fine-tuning downward, so that interest rates that are too high do not hold back the recovery. Only one argued for keeping the rate for a prolonged period and warned that it might be necessary to discuss following the Fed's cycle of hikes.
What the Fed had done
A week earlier, on September 16, the Federal Reserve raised U.S. interest rates by 0.25 percentage point, to the range of 3.75% to 4%, in the face of inflation driven by energy since the war with Iran. The Fed's own projections pointed to one more hike still in 2026.
The decision narrowed the gap between the two countries' interest rates. According to the Institute of International Finance, the differential came to 2.5 percentage points, the narrowest on a sustained basis since 2008. That gap supported an operation known as the carry trade: borrowing in dollars, at low interest rates, and investing in pesos, at high interest rates. With the margin smaller and the market more volatile, staying in pesos became less rewarding.
What happened to the peso
In our daily series, the dollar cost 16.88 pesos on September 5, the peso's best level of the year. On the eve of the Fed decision, it stood at 17.15; on the eve of the Banxico decision, at 17.54; at the end of September, at 18.08. By the central bank's official data, the peso lost 6.38% in the month, the largest monthly drop since June 2024.
The decline continued in October and accelerated on the day of the minutes: on October 8, the peso fell 1.22%, the emerging-market currency that lost the most value in the session. On October 16, it closed at 18.50 per dollar by the official rate, extending six weeks of depreciation, the worst streak since 2019. Since September's best level, the loss is 9.54%.
The dollar strengthened worldwide over the period, but that explains only part of the move: in our series, the dollar index against major currencies rose 2.4% between August 31 and October 16. Among the five Latin American currencies we track daily, the Mexican peso was the one that lost the most value over the same interval — 8.7%, against 5.4% for the Chilean peso and 4.2% for the Peruvian sol. The real and the Colombian peso ended the period stronger than they began.
An analyst interviewed by the Mexican press recalls that the interest-rate differential alone hardly explains the speed of the fall: insurance against default on Mexican debt also became more expensive, and the U.S. discussion about banning diesel exports weighed in the same days. In mid-October, the agency HR Ratings downgraded the country's sovereign credit rating.
Why the bank accepts it
Governor Victoria Rodríguez explained the logic in an interview. The United States has a strong labor market and demand-driven inflation; Mexico is operating with idle capacity, and fuel subsidies cushioned the energy shock there. The flexible exchange rate, she said, exists to absorb external shocks, and the pass-through of depreciation to prices tends to be low as long as the economy has slack.
The inflation numbers give some support to that argument. In September, annual inflation rose to 3.45%, driven by tomatoes and onions, but core inflation — which excludes the most volatile items — fell to 3.75%, and goods inflation, the most sensitive to the exchange rate, was at 3.21%. All within the tolerance range of 2% to 4%. The bank projects reaching the 3% target in the fourth quarter of 2027.
Where the bet may fail
The bank itself listed the peso's depreciation among the upside risks to inflation. A market estimate calculates that the fall since September could add 0.46 percentage point to inflation over the next twelve months, mainly through imported goods. Producer prices were already rising 4.05% a year in September.
There is also the cost of financing. At the Treasury bond auction of September 29, rates rose across nearly all maturities, and the gap between the shortest and the longest reached 1.43 percentage points. HR Ratings estimates that the depreciation raises public debt from 54% to 55% of GDP.
And there is precedent. In December 2015, Banxico raised rates the day after the Fed; in February 2016, with the peso under pressure, it made an extraordinary hike of 0.5 percentage point. An economist at the Institute of International Finance summed up the dilemma: the bank will not copy every Fed hike, but the peso is precisely the variable that could force it to raise.
Reading
Banxico is not wrong to say that Mexico is not the United States. Core inflation is falling and the economy is growing little. What changed the picture was less the September 24 decision than the signal of cuts that came in the minutes, at a moment when the market was already demanding more to stay in pesos.
The November 5 decision will show whether the declared independence holds with the currency 9.5% weaker than in September. If the depreciation begins to show up in prices, the bank will have to choose between consistency with what it said and defense of the currency.
Analytical rigor
Below we state what could bring this reading down, and how far it reaches.
What would disprove this analysis
- If Banxico raises the rate on November 5 without a new Fed hike, the reading that the bank accepted letting the exchange rate absorb the shock will be wrong.
- If goods inflation exceeds 4% a year by the December release, the premise of low exchange-rate pass-through to prices — which is the bank's and which we took as plausible — will have failed.
- If the peso returns below 17.50 per dollar by the end of 2026 with no change in interest rates in either country, the weight we attribute to the interest-rate differential in the fall will have been overstated.
The limits of this analysis
- We did not read Banxico's statement or minutes in full. The phrases quoted come from the coverage, which reproduces them the same way across different outlets.
- The chart uses our daily exchange-rate series, which differs by hundredths from the official rate published by Banxico and used by the Mexican press. That is why September's drop appears as 6.34% in our data and 6.38% in the coverage.
- We did not separate how much of the peso's fall comes from the interest-rate differential, the strong dollar, the war and country risk. We have no data on capital flows or carry trade positions.
- We did not read the HR Ratings report. The downgrade and the estimated effect on debt come from the coverage.
- The estimate that the depreciation could add 0.46 percentage point to inflation over twelve months is from an analyst at a private bank, with no methodology published in the coverage.
- Our foreign trade data are from 2024.
Level of confidence
72%
The decision, the statement and the minutes are recorded with the same phrases by the Mexican press, by two international agencies reproduced in outlets in other countries and by English-language coverage. The peso's path comes from our own daily exchange-rate series and matches the official data cited by the press. What holds the grade down: we did not read the bank's documents; the split of the fall among interest rates, a strong dollar and country risk is analysts' inference, not a measurement; and the pass-through to prices does not yet show in the data.
Trade and exposure
Participações calculadas sobre os dados de comércio bilateral consolidados.
Trade exposure — Mexico
| Counterparts | % | US$ |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69.62% | US$ 766.1bn |
| China | 12.59% | US$ 138.5bn |
| Canada | 2.87% | US$ 31.6bn |
| Germany | 2.59% | US$ 28.5bn |
| South Korea | 2.46% | US$ 27.0bn |
| Japan | 2.14% | US$ 23.5bn |
| S19 | 2.05% | US$ 22.6bn |
| Brazil | 1.49% | US$ 16.4bn |
Trade composition
| Sectors | % | US$ |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing and automotive | 40.14% | US$ 441.7bn |
| Electronics | 26.11% | US$ 287.3bn |
| Energy | 6.28% | US$ 69.1bn |
| Chemicals and petrochemicals | 5.74% | US$ 63.2bn |
| Steel | 4.05% | US$ 44.6bn |
| Agriculture and food | 3.70% | US$ 40.8bn |